Monday, October 29, 2018

Dummycrat Is Hate Speech According To Facebook

Editorial By Leonard Lenny Vasbinder
October 29, 2018

On October 5, 2018, on my main Facebook page, @LennyVasbinder, I posted a link to a news article related to the upcoming election on Tuesday, November 6, 2018.  As part of my comment about the news article, I made a rather benign joke, "And remember, to cut back on lines, Republicans vote on Nov. 6 and democrats vote on Nov. 7. :D" Yes, I included the Big Smiley to further indicate it was a joke as if it wasn't already obvious to everyone--except a dummycrat.

Apparently, this benign joke was so offensive to Facebook that they deleted my post and put me in Facebook Jail for 30 days. Yes, I have previously been in Facebook Jail for one-day and three-day stints.

Here is a screenshot of the notice that I got from Facebook before being put in Facebook Jail for 30 days.


I get out of Facebook Jail in five days and will be back to my antics but in the interim, I have started exploring the social media site, Snippy.com, and my new profile there is https://snippy.com/u/profile/OrVwHQRmwn. I heard about Snippy on the Buck Sexton talk radio show.

Monday, October 15, 2018

WHERE ARE OUR MILLIONAIRES?


Vasbinder.Leonard.Lenny.Suit Tie Face

By Leonard “Lenny” Vasbinder
Originally published Feb. 8, 2017 (in the Delgado Dolphin Newspaper)
If you want to be a Hollywood South millionaire, you do not need to be a well-known actor, producer, or director. All you need is $900,000.00 and the State of Louisiana will pay you the difference.
Let me explain. According to Gordon Russell’s investigative report, “Giving Away Louisiana: Film Tax Incentives,” in The Advocate, Dec. 2, 2014, “Film productions don’t have any corporate tax liability because they are set up as limited liability companies that simply make payments to actors, crew, and vendors. Profits from a film are taxable, but they go to the film’s investors, who are usually based elsewhere. As a result, most productions sell their tax credits to someone who owes taxes, which is legal under Louisiana state law, usually getting about 90 cents for each $1 worth of tax credit. Buyers, many of them wealthy movers and shakers, get 100 cents on the dollar from the state, creating a group of influential middlemen who benefit from the program.”
Will French, who helped author the Louisiana Film Tax Credit law, is also a major player in the film tax credit exchange industry. The Secretary of State records show he is the founder and/or officer of many businesses with “tax credit” as part of the business name, (Louisiana Tax Credit Finance, LLC, Oauchita Tax Credit Finance, LLC, and many others.) He is also listed as the co-founder of the Louisiana Film & Entertainment Association, a trade association that vehemently opposed the changing of the law and issued the talking points to the local actors, unions, and trade groups, who added their voice to the protest.
Julia O’Donoghue’s article, “Louisiana film tax credits could face restrictions, though what type is unclear,” in the Times-Picayune on April 28, 2015 documents more statements from Will French.
With all the controversy concerning the film tax credit program in the past two years, it brings to light, again, the fact that after 15 years and nearly $2 billion of Louisiana taxpayer dollars going into the film industry through the tax credit program, we have very little out-of-state infrastructure investment, and we still do not have a single producer, director, or actor, that is a Louisiana local resident, that has made even one of those million dollar paychecks, even though Louisiana has spent a billion dollars in six years, between 2008 and 2014.
For folks who may not realize just how much a billion dollars is, it is equal to one thousand millionaires! So out of nearly two thousand million dollars, over the past 15 years, do you really mean to tell me that not a single one of those million dollar checks could have been spent on the hiring and promoting of a single Louisiana resident to a major film job?
That is what was and still is wrong with the tax credit program. There is nothing that really pushes Hollywood to hire local or to permanently invest locally. The big productions come and go every 60 — 90 days and leave with millions of dollars of our hard-earned tax dollars each time they leave. And they leave almost nothing tangible behind — no studios, no office buildings, no local producers, no local directors, and no local actors that were promoted as a big star and paid the big bucks.
It should be noted that the filming of Season 3 of “NCIS: New Orleans” opened with the loss of “Brody” and even that spot could have been filled by a local Louisiana actress but instead, CBS went out of state for the actress to fill that spot with a NY actress, Vanessa Ferlito, taking the spot. On a positive note, the show, as a local television series, has hired and promoted some locals to upper-level positions, but still no millionaires.
On a negative note, tens of thousands of the jobs that the film industry does give to locals are minimum wage or $8 an hour jobs as background (a/k/a extras) and are only day-player jobs. Since the production gets a 40 percent rebate on those wages, it means the production is actually only paying out an effective rate of $4.80 (or less) an hour. Further, considering the taxpayers are paying the 40 percent rebate, it’s a double whammy to these very low paid workers. These background workers are almost always hired on a day-to-day basis and get a “pink slip” at the end of each day.
Hopefully, the new tax credit law changes, written by the legislature in 2015, which are geared more toward developing and promoting local, homegrown productions, will also open the doors for more local producers, directors, and talent to become more experienced and better known so that one of us will make one of those million dollar paychecks in the very near future.
For all the so-called “industry leaders,” trade groups, and workers in the industry who are crying about the $180M cap on the tax credits, only two years out of 16 have gone over $180M and I do not recall the sky falling during those other 14 years. Yes, y’all are “acting” like Chicken Little.
One major suggestion for the next revision to the tax credit law would be to put in a clause that makes Louisiana an investor in each production that receives money from our tax credit program. For the past 15 years, we have invested almost $2 BILLION and have not gotten a single penny back from any of the productions that made money. There have been countless blockbusters that went on to make billions of dollars in combined profits over the years and each and every one of them should have had to pay back our investment, with an appropriate return. Every other investor in a film project expects to be paid back their investment with a nice return whenever a film is profitable — why shouldn’t we?

Tuesday, October 9, 2018

University of New Orleans (UNO) Tuition, Fees, and Charges Explained — Part 1

By: Leonard Lenny Vasbinder

Republished October 9, 2018 — originally published in the UNO Driftwood newspaper September 15, 2017. https://unodriftwood.com/1855/news/tuition-fees-and-charges-explained-part-i/

If you looked at your Fee Bill or Student Account Detail on the University of New Orleans (UNO) WebStar site, you may have noticed all the fees that are on your bill besides just tuition. These fees have been an ongoing concern for the thousands of students who have to pay all these fees each semester — often for things they may never use.

While students have been hearing about cutbacks from state subsidies that caused their tuition to go up, many universities and colleges have also been tacking on fees that further increased the total amount that each student pays every semester.
According to this article, https://unodriftwood.com/868/news/uno-tuition-price-holds-steady-fees-nearly-double/, in The Driftwood in fall 2016, tuition has remained steady the past couple of years but the fees have risen considerably. Where tuition has increased from $2,582 to $3,045 between fall 2012 and fall 2016/2017, an increase of nearly $500.00 (nearly 20 percent), fees have more than quadrupled from $343 to almost $1,450 (over 400 percent). According to the article, “Just four years ago, a student could attend UNO for less than half the price of what the tuition [and fees are] now.”

A really big and unexplained fee is for Other Mandatory Fees — $529.81. The Privateer Bucks, Fuel Recovery Charge, and Student Retention Initiative Fee are other larger fees that were not easily recognized for what they are.

Bursar Brett Cassell was asked for comment on the fees and referred all inquiries to the public relations department representative, Adam Norris. When contacted, Norris, UNO’s chief communications officer, asked for all questions to be put in writing and Norris replied by email.

“The Other Mandatory Fees are comprised of the various Tuition Components. We do not publish these, but they are as follows, and most are self-explanatory: 1. General Fee, 2. Campus Beautification Fee, 3. SS Referendum ’87, 4. Facility Use and Maintenance, 5. Auxiliary Plant, 6. Athletics, 7. Student Health, 8. University Center, 9. Student Services, 10. University Services, 11. Driftwood [possibly meaning this newspaper], and 12. Wellness Center,” said Norris.

Norris further stated that the following link gives a description of most of the fees. You can just click on the fee at the bottom of the Web page to see an explanation of them. http://www.uno.edu/bursar/tuitionfees.aspx. “Also, there are numerous courses with Course Fees added by the department,” added Norris. Here is a link to a list of those fees [near the bottom]: http://www.uno.edu/registrar/catalog/1718catalog/tuition-fees.aspx

“Regarding the Privateer Bucks, any unused portion will roll forward as long as the student is at UNO. Once the student either graduates or leaves UNO, the student can receive a full refund for any unused portion of the Privateer Bucks,” said Norris.

According to this second article, https://unodriftwood.com/1049/university/university-administration-explains-current-fee-increases/) in the Driftwood in fall 2016, “There will be no tuition increase,” said Adam Norris, the university’s chief communication officer. “Rather than increase tuition, the university tacked on two other mandatory university fees: the Privateers Spirit fee and the Student Retention Initiative fee. “The dedicated fees were taken to the Student Government and a separate open forum was held in May [2016] to discuss the proposed fees. The rationale for these fees was shared at that forum, as we wanted student input and feedback,” said Norris. Norris added, “It should be noted that these are mandatory fees, and financial aid and scholarships can be used to cover their cost.”

Most of the students talked to about these fees had not really looked into them. They were surprised at how many fees there were and the dollar amount on some of them.

“I live at Privateer Place and go to UNO full-time and I could have used the $125 mandated for Privateer Bucks to buy food that I could have cooked myself instead of spending it on much higher priced restaurant food. I could have also used that money for books, rent, and other necessities,” said Ngugi Gathige, an incoming transfer student from Delgado Community College (DCC). “It’s bad enough that UNO costs twice as much than DCC and my grants do not cover all the tuition and fees so I had to pay out-of-pocket for some of the expenses and books,” continued Gathige.

“The much higher and continually rising cost to attend UNO will also mean higher student loans that have to be paid back by so many students,” said Gathige.

“While wages for most people in Louisiana have remained stagnant for the past 10 years, the cost of going to college just keeps going up higher and higher,” said Gathige.

Delgado Community College Tuition Up Over 100 Percent In The Past Seven Years

By: Leonard Lenny Vasbinder

Republished October 9, 2018 — originally published in The Delgado Dolphin online newspaper, Spring 2017. The Dolphin has now been canceled by Delgado Community College as part of their eliminating the entire Mass Comm program.

Delgado Community College in New Orleans, with several campuses in the surrounding metropolitan area, has seen a substantial spike in tuition in the past seven years.

After having stable tuition fees and costs from Fall 2005 through Spring 2010, the Fall 2010 semester saw the first increase from $768 ($979 with fees) to $944 ($1,195 with fees), an increase of nearly 23 percent for tuition and just over 22 percent for tuition and fees. The Spring 2012 semester maintained the same pricing.

Fall 2011 saw another increase of about 12 percent. Fall 2012, 2013, and 2014 saw similar double-digit increases each year with a slight slowdown for Fall 2015 of only 10 percent tuition and 6.4 percent tuition and fees increase. Fall 2016 did not increase, nor did Spring 2017.

The combined increase is 109 percent for tuition from Fall 2009 to Fall 2015 and 99.7 percent for tuition and fees during the same period, more than double what it cost just eight years ago.

These increases were authorized by the state legislature in 2010 to allow universities to offset the cuts from their state funding.

Recent reports show a drop in enrollment of around 7 percent from 2009 to 2015, with another 5 percent drop from 2015 to 2016. Delgado still has the second highest enrollment in higher education in Louisiana.

Delgado did not reply with a comment in time for the original publication.

Thursday, October 4, 2018

Constitutional Amendment Six (6) Affecting Property Taxes is on the upcoming November 6 ballot

Press Release edited by:
Leonard Lenny Vasbinder

October 04, 2018

CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT 6 PROPERTY TAX AMENDMENT IS ON THE NOVEMBER 6 STATEWIDE BALLOT

FACTS ABOUT CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT 6

Amendment 6 will buffer property owners from large property tax increases if there is a steep increase in value.

Actual Text of Proposed Amendment No. 6: Act 718 of the 2018 Regular Session of the Louisiana Legislature proposing to amend Article VII, Section 18(A) and (F) of the Louisiana Constitution. Do you support an amendment that will require that any reappraisal of the value of residential property by more than 50%, resulting in a corresponding increase in property taxes, be phased-in over the course of four years during which time no additional reappraisal can occur and that the decrease in the total ad valorem tax collected as a result of the phase-in of assessed valuation be absorbed by the taxing authority and not allocated to the other taxpayers?

WHAT DOES CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT (CA) 6 DO?

By law in Louisiana, tax assessors must reassess all properties at least once every four years. When property values rise in your area, you could see big increases in your assessment and, therefore, in your property taxes. Under CA 6, if you have a homestead exemption and your property assessment increases by 50 percent or more during a single assessment, this law phases in the increase in your property tax bill equally over the next four years.

WHY IS IT NECESSARY?

Real estate prices have increased so quickly in many places. In some neighborhoods, rapidly rising values and taxes have priced residents out of their own homes! This law, if approved by voters November 6, would soften the blow of a potentially steep increase in your tax bill. That beats being hit with a large increase all at once.


HOW DOES IT WORK?

Let's say your house is valued at $100,000 one year, but reassessed at $200,000 the next year. Instead of paying taxes on the full $200,000 that first year, it would phase in over four years:

Year 1: held to $125,000 assessment
Year 2: held to $150,000 assessment
Year 3: held to $175,000 assessment
Year 4: $200,000 assessment

For more information, https://ballotpedia.org/Louisiana_Amendment_6,_Phase-In_of_Tax_Increases_from_Property_Reappraisal_Amendment_ (2018)